Le Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 05:04:09PM +0100, Jan Stary a écrit :
> The python-3.10 port provides a 'python3' symlink,
> but python-3.11 does not. This makes build systems using AM_PYTHON,
> such as libsndfile's ./configure as produced by automake-1.16.5,
> _miss_ python, because python.m4 does this:
> 
> AC_DEFUN([AM_PATH_PYTHON],
>  [
>   dnl Find a Python interpreter.  Python versions prior to 2.0 are not
>   dnl supported. (2.0 was released on October 16, 2000).
>   m4_define_default([_AM_PYTHON_INTERPRETER_LIST],
> [python python2 python3 dnl
>  python3.9 python3.8 python3.7 python3.6 python3.5 python3.4 python3.3 dnl
>  python3.2 python3.1 python3.0 dnl
>  python2.7 python2.6 python2.5 python2.4 python2.3 python2.2 python2.1 dnl
>  python2.0])
> 
> So python3.10 is found via the python3 symlink, but python3.11 is not found.
> 
> I don't use python as such. Is that the port adding the symlink,
> or the 3.10 distribution? Can we please have the symlink for 3.11
> as well? That's probably the easiest way to accommodate such systems.
> 
> (God I hate autotools.)

Mandatory related hackathon t-shirt image:
http://www.openbsd.org/images/hackathons/p2k9.gif

Reply via email to