06.01.2023 11:41, Dima Pasechnik пишет: > For what's worth, cmake's option to build Python modules, as extensions > of C/C++ libraries, is getting more and more popular - with "proper" > Python packaging continuing to be a mess (with deprecated and to be > dropped in Python 3.12 distutils, badly documented setuptools, > variety of other options such as meson(-python), python-build, poetry, etc...)
Neither do I follow cmake development, nor do I know enough python internals, but I can say that e.g. net/libtorrent-rasterbar just works with cmake while autoconf and/or direct python packaging needs little help left and right -- see the diff on ports@.
