On 2022/12/29 19:19:23 +0100, Joel Carnat <j...@carnat.net> wrote:
> Le 29/12/2022 à 12:42, Stuart Henderson a écrit :
> > For the fonts I think I'd probably pick a couple that already exist in
> > ports/fonts. Simplest approach for ports layout is probably like
> > ports/fonts/nerd-fonts/{terminus,profont,noto) or similar, using the
> > release
> > zips rather than downloading the full repo, factoring out as much as
> > possible
> > to Makefile.inc.
> >
>
> Attached is an archive to deploy such
> ports/fonts/nerd-fonts/{terminus,profont,noto}. I'm sorry, I couldn't find
> the
> proper cvs command to generate the diff file for those.
it's not straightforward to generate a diff that adds directory,
tarball for new ports are fine.
> Does this seem right?
looks good to me. just some nitpicks
- REVISION starts empty, then goes 0, 1, ... so dropped it
- COMMENT and CATEGORIES can be moved to Makefile.inc too
- could set PKG_ARCH=*
I probably got too overboard then but if you define NF_FONT with the
capitalized name (i.e. CodeNewRoman instead of codenewroman) you can
move PKGNAME, DISTFILES and EXTRACT_SUFX to Makefile.inc, with the
only package affected being 'ubunut-mono' becoming 'ubuntumono'.
it could also use the font.port.mk module, allowing to drop all the
do-install targets. (well, kept the licenses installing as
post-install.)
(for a moment I thought of defining NF_FONT=${.CURDIR:T} and renaming
the dirs, that would made most of the makefiles a one-liner, too
extreme tho.)
nerd-fonts.tar.gz
Description: applications/gzip
