On 2022/10/24 17:29, Omar Polo wrote:
> On 2022/10/15 22:27:46 +0300, "Kirill Bychkov" <ki...@linklevel.net> wrote:
> > On Sun, May 15, 2022 16:06, wen heping wrote:
> > > It could be build with root privilege, failed with unprivilege user.
> >
> > Hi,
> > Limits were the cause of breaking sigil build. Setting stacksize-cur=8M in
> > login.conf allows me to build it without issues on amd64. I can say more:
> > sigil-1.4.3 fails on -current without bumping limits. So the diff Wen sent
> > was
> > good enough. Since then sigil-1.9.20 was released. It also needs stacksize
> > bump. Launches without issues on amd564. Updated diff attached.
>
> sorry for the delay,
>
> not a sigil user, but it now builds fine and runs fine (i can click
> around in the gui, the editor seem to work.)
>
> patch-CMakeLists_txt needs a regen, and `make package' complains that:
>
> Warning: entries NOT added to sigil-1.9.20:
> share/sigil/python3lib/updatechecker.py.orig (.orig suffix ?)
>
> (maybe it did it in the past too)
>
> not a huge issue, but i don't know if it's preferred to delete
> .${PATCHORIG} files in pre-install or just leave make package ignore
> them.
either way works (but if rm'ing, please do use ${PATCHORIG} rather
than hardcoding, so that it doesn't fail for people who have set
PATCHORIG to something else in /etc/mk.conf)
