On Tue, 18 Oct 2022, Stefan Hagen wrote: > Stefan Hagen wrote (2022-10-18 08:17 CEST): > > Paco Esteban wrote (2022-10-17 22:54 CEST): > > > Also, `port-lib-depends-check` says: > > > > > > fzf-0.34.0(sysutils/fzf): > > > Extra: c.96 pthread.26 > > > > > > but c and pthread are already on WANTLIB. Am I missing something ? > > > > > > Builds and runs ok for me on amd64. Adding edd@ in CC as maintainer. > > > > Yes, it wants you to *remove* them from WANTLIB.
Got it. Thanks. > > There is a typo in the README: > > - source /usr/local/share/fzf/bash/key_bindings.bash > > + source /usr/local/share/fzf/bash/key-bindings.bash > > > > > # uses pledge() > > > > If you check the fzf distfile from edd, you see that he added pledge > > support. And because we can't patch go ports, he created a distfile. > > > > I'd say let's stick with edds efforts as long as he's willing to carry > > over his patch and host the distfile. Did not notice that. Will let edd@ decide then. > > @edd: Maybe add a comment why the distfile is used. > > > > Best Regards, > > Stefan > > Btw. there is another fzf update thread going on this list: > https://marc.info/?t=166513610200001&r=1&w=2 It seems I need to pay more attention to ports@ these days ... I guess then edd@ picks and chooses and somebody commits. Let me know if that somebody is me via any channel ;-) Cheers, Paco. -- Paco Esteban. 0x5818130B8A6DBC03
