Hi George, On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 5:19 PM George Koehler <kern...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 11 Sep 2022 13:48:34 -0700 > Kyle Milz <krwm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Recently I needed plan9port for i386 and to my surprise it builds and > > light testing of mk and acme work fine. > > > > I was curious if macppc was also fixed, so I built and tested that as > > well, with the same results. > > Good find! I can also build it on powerpc64. I applied your diff > and deleted ONLY_FOR_ARCHS, so I have the diff below.
Unfortunately, building at least on sparc64 does not complete. Curiously it also does not fail, it just stops after 'mk' is compiled. So I think ONLY_FOR_ARCHES may need to be retained, with the platforms we have tested. > I can run a few simple commands like "9 man intro" and "9 ls" on > macppc and powerpc64. I can also start 9term on macppc; I'm not > running X on powerpc64. > > The broken OpenBSD-386-asm.S no longer exists, after git commits to > src/libthread in Dec 2020 deleted OpenBSD-*-asm.S and switched to > pthreads(3). This might fix the threading problems and allow any > OpenBSD arch to build plan9port. > > --George > > Index: Makefile > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/ports/plan9/plan9port/Makefile,v > retrieving revision 1.39 > diff -u -p -r1.39 Makefile > --- Makefile 11 Mar 2022 19:49:08 -0000 1.39 > +++ Makefile 14 Sep 2022 20:57:45 -0000 > @@ -1,7 +1,3 @@ > -ONLY_FOR_ARCHS = amd64 i386 powerpc > -BROKEN-i386 = various "invalid operand for instruction", > OpenBSD-386-asm.S > -BROKEN-powerpc = threading issues > - > COMMENT = Plan 9 from user space > > DISTNAME = plan9port-20210323
