On 7/26/2022 9:43 AM, Landry Breuil wrote: > Le Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 12:20:03PM +0200, Caspar Schutijser a écrit : >> I build-tested this and also did some runtime testing of Calibre and >> that seems to work fine. So in that sense it's OK. But the veusz >> problem is still there, right? I looked around in some other ports >> collections but I've not been able to find a patch we can borrow. So >> I guess someone actually has to look at the problem. Don't have time >> for that myself right now. > > there's an example on > https://github.com/veusz/veusz/issues/595#issuecomment-1193392261 but it > looks... only for sip wizards. > > bcallah, what's your opinion as math/veusz maintainer ? > > Landry >
I won't be able to look at this until the weekend. I will have to become a sip wizard I suppose. If the py-qt5 update needs to go in and veusz is the only blocker, I suppose we can mark veusz BROKEN until then. I know it's not ideal, but I don't see a better option in that case. ~Brian
