On 2022/07/20 17:15, tux0r wrote: > Stuart Henderson schrob am 20.07.2022 um 14:21: > > >The COMMENT assumes that one knows what ZPAQ is. It would be better if > >it described what the software does, and leave "it is a fork of foo" to > >DESCR. > > Makes sense. Attached is an updated archive. Having ZPAQ in the COMMENT still > sounds reasonable to me, as it is a (relatively) well-known software and > people might search for it directly.
There's a size limit on COMMENT, see bsd.port.mk(5) for details. I propose "journaling archiver for incremental backup, fork of ZPAQ" which fits. (No need to send a new tar). With that change it's OK sthen@ to import
