On Sat Apr 30, 2022 at 04:37:12PM +0200, Solène Rapenne wrote: > Hi, > > I don't know if it has been debated before but I'd like to propose a > change, or at least discuss about it. > > - people submitting new ports must become maintainer > > - ports without a maintainer must find a maintainer > > - ports where the maintainer is getting removed or not answering MUST > find a new maintainer > > To make this more feasable, maybe we could create some small groups of > maintainers for specific areas like language specific ports (ghc, > python etc..). MAINTAINER could be a single person or a list of person, > or refer to a maintainer group defined somewhere else. > > Like, if you join the python maintainer group, you are fine dealing > with all the python packages that doesn't have a maintainer (this would > be set to the group). >
What problem are you trying to address?
