Hello! On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 08:12:21AM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote: >On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 11:03:01PM -0300, Andr?s Delfino wrote: >| >And what/who needs this?
>| Sorry, but, is that question relevant? I mean, shoudn't the ports tree >| have all the programs it can? :S >I don't think that's the goal of the OpenBSD portstree. The portstree >(or better, packaging system) should be an easy to use interface to >add functionality to OpenBSD that is missing from the base >installation. If GNU Sed doesn't add anything that the default sed(1) >is missing (I don't know, I think this is what Peter is asking), why >should it be added to the tree ? There are sed scripts out there that are GNU sed specific. Alas. But GNU sed has a few features that sed(1) doesn't have. Kind regards, Hannah.
