On 2022/01/11 23:06, Philip Guenther wrote: > On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 4:09 PM Daniel Dickman <didick...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 8:12 PM Leo Larnack <l...@pseven.xyz> wrote: > > > > > > i386 > > > > > > > > > > > with this diff I was able to install includes, rebuild ld.so and > > ctfconv. I've not managed to build a release yet. > > ... > > Umm, with what diff? There was no diff in nor attached to that message. > :-/
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=164186375804139&w=2 > (That was a lot of lines of output. I don't know about ports@, but my > expectation would be there would be *zero* reviewers of anything before, > say, the last 50 lines of output before the switch to actual compilation. > Standard "make lots of noise so when a failure occurs we can see the > leadup, but we'll ignore it otherwise" style of output, like a base build. > You read the lead up to the warnings and errors only. <shrug>) The output from configure scripts and previous build stages is often quite important when figuring out a build problem (especially if something works on some machines and fails on others). To my eyes the key bit is probably Created structure Motif ******Writing object code****** Segmentation fault (core dumped) *** Error 139 in . (Makefile:1158 'polyexport.o') but somebody else might notice something different
