I think that’s an interesting idea. numpy will prefer BLAS libraries in this order if they’re all present:
MKL BLIS OpenBLAS ATLAS BLAS (NetLIB) So I think it’s a vote for openblas over netlib blas. Btw if openblas is added, wouldn’t lapack also have to be replaced as well? And not just blas? > On Dec 18, 2021, at 6:59 AM, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote: > > Would it make sense to replace blas with openblas? > > -- > Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting. > >> On 17 December 2021 13:43:25 Rafael Sadowski <raf...@sizeofvoid.org> wrote: >> >>> On Fri Dec 17, 2021 at 01:03:30PM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Please find attached a port of the openblas. >>> >>> Description: >>> OpenBLAS is an optimized BLAS (Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms) library >>> based on GotoBLAS2 1.13 BSD version. >>> >>> It's loosely based on the one at openbsd-wip [1]. >>> I tested on i386, amd64, arm, arm64, and mips64. >>> >>> I didn't test on others platforms due to lack of hardware. >>> If somebody is interested, can you give it a try, check if it works for >>> you and give some feedback? Thanks. >>> >>> [1] https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/tree/master/math/openblas >>> >>> Regards, >>> Kevin >> >> I like to see openblas, I really do. But I think it will be found by >> many other ports when it is imported. Checkout "This port is required >> by" from https://www.freshports.org/math/openblas/ >> >> That means a bit more work needs to happen here, doesn't it? >
