Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> writes: > On 2021/12/10 09:50, Omar Polo wrote: >> Timo Myyrä <timo.my...@bittivirhe.fi> writes: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > Pekwm got new minor release containing fixes. It adds a new >> > configuration option which allows us to remove local doc patch. With quick >> > test >> > seems to be working ok here on amd64.
Thanks, committed! >> [...] >> >> Just one curiosity, now there are only two remaining patches and they're >> both for pledge, has anybody tried to upstream those? They seem in a >> good shape for being merged, but I don't see anything on github. I'm >> missing some bit of history here? > > personally I prefer it if pledge patches aren't upstreamed unless > upstream is actively running and testing with OpenBSD, we can easily > end up in the situation like with i3 where we have to patch to remove > them again. I didn't know about the i3 case, I agree completely then. The two patches are also small and not a burden. (also, if upstream is actively running and testing with OpenBSD chances are that we don't need to add pledge patches in the first place ;-)
