November 25, 2021 10:14 AM, "Stuart Henderson" <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote:
> On 2021/11/24 11:27, joshua stein wrote: > >> On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 18:09:33 +0100, Clemens Gößnitzer wrote: >> Beginning with this email, I'll send out a couple of new ports which are all >> dependencies for www/ruby-jekyll. With these, I get a working jekyll for my >> applications. I tested that `serve' and `build' commands work, and >> --incremental and --watch flags, too. If you have some more tests, I'd be >> happy >> to know if something does not work. >> >> Is there really any reason to keep this in the ports tree? I >> thought we were doing away with ports for simple Ruby modules. >> >> Jekyll installs fine with Bundler and since I'd imagine most would >> need a custom Gemfile with other things in it anyway, why bother >> having a system-wide Jekyll installation that will be ~6 months out >> of date in each OpenBSD release? > > Besides this, sending a batch of this many new ports in one go is too > much for us to deal with, manageable chunks please. Max 3 or 4 at once would > be more like it (keep dependency chains together, in a single email if > they're fairly closely related). Yes that was enthustiastic overkill from my side - sorry for that. Then I'll drop the effort for jekyll. Thanks for your patience.
