On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 02:30:46PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2021/11/03 15:04, Marc Espie wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 01:04:38PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2021/11/03 12:55, Ricardo Mestre wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > And now with diff attached, files retrieved from maintainer's gh > > > > repository. > > > > > > > > Still works on amd64, OK? > > > > > > $ make show=PKGNAMES > > > lha-1.14i-ac20210926 > > > > > > this is invalid, the ac20210926 is in the part of the name that is > > > reserved for flavours > > > > > > > > I've added tools to the ports tree to check for that, actually. > > hub$ /usr/ports/infrastructure/bin/pkg_check-version -H lha-1.14i-ac20210926 > > lha-1.14i-ac20210926: > > stem: lha > > version (split): 1 14i > > no suffix > > no REVISION > > no EPOCH > > flavors: ac20210926 > > > > works wonders in case you have any doubt ;) > > > > if you remember to run it. But since people keep sending things with > "XXX not needed for" in pkg_create which is printed by default I don't > have much hope for anything needing extra steps .. > > As a rule, if an existing port has distinct PKGNAME/DISTNAME, you should always verify your names.
Maybe I should add a "MAINTAINER" thingy that runs extra checks by default ?...
