On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 09:43:10PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: Hello Edd,
> Attached is a (gzipped) diff to update to TeX Live 2021. Please test > your documents! This worked fine for me (my LaTeX papers build happily with it), but `make update` initially failed with: Upgrading from texlive_base-2020p0 texlive_base+texlive_mktexlsr+texlive_texmf-buildset-2020p0->texlive_mktexlsr-2021 forward dependencies: | Dependencies of texlive_texmf-minimal-2020p0 on texlive_base->=2020p0,texlive_texmf-buildset-2020p0 don't match | Dependency of rubber-1.5.1 on texlive_base-* doesn't match Merging texlive_texmf-minimal-2020p0->2021 (ok) NOT MERGING: can't find update for rubber-1.5.1-> (ok) texlive_base-2020p0+texlive_texmf-buildset-2020p0+texlive_texmf-full-2020p1+texlive_texmf-minimal-2020p0->texlive_texmf-buildset-2021 forward dependencies: | Dependency of rubber-1.5.1 on texlive_base-* doesn't match NOT MERGING: can't find update for rubber-1.5.1-> (ok) texlive_base+texlive_texmf-buildset-2020p0->texlive_base-2021 forward dependencies: | Dependency of texlive_texmf-minimal-2020p0 on texlive_texmf-buildset-2020p0 doesn't match Merging texlive_texmf-minimal-2020p0->2021 (ok) Can't install texlive_base-2020p0+texlive_texmf-buildset-2020p0+texlive_texmf-full-2020p1+texlive_texmf-minimal-2020p0->texlive_base+texlive_texmf-minimal-2021: can't resolve texlive_texmf-buildset-2021 Couldn't find updates for rubber-1.5.1 texlive_base-2020p0 texlive_mktexlsr-2020p0 texlive_texmf-buildset-2020p0 texlive_texmf-full-2020p1 texlive_texmf-minimal-2020p0 Couldn't install texlive_base-2021 texlive_mktexlsr-2021 texlive_texmf-buildset-2021 texlive_texmf-minimal-2021 *** Error 1 in /home/ports/print/texlive/base (/home/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2171 '/home/ports/update/amd64/texlive_base-2021') *** Error 2 in /home/ports/print/texlive/base (/home/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2602 'update': @lock=texlive_base-2021; export _LO...) Deleting the `rubber` package allowed `make update` to proceed. I'm not sure why rubber caused a problem -- it doesn't seem to be anything to do with TeXLive package as such? Laurie
