Guess that's my queue.

Attached is a very very rough port of haproxy, but it's enough to get it
going on 4.0.

Jim

On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 02:48:10PM -0700, christian johansson wrote:
> On 3/28/07, Dan Brosemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 12:20:53PM -0700, christian johansson wrote:
> >
> > Some people on this list speak highly of pound.  I haven't used it myself
> > yet.
> >
> > I like haproxy.  I've run it in an 80,000 (mod_perl-generated) page per
> > hour
> > situation on nothing more than simple desktop hardware and it Just
> > Worked(tm).  There's no port, but I know someone who made one and could
> > pester him to post it. :)
> 
> 
> If I don't like pound or can't get it working in a good way, I'd very much
> like for you to do some pestering :)
> 
> Now that was a while ago.  If I was doing it again today, I'd seriously look
> > at the built in hoststated and pf.  That work looks exciting.
> 
> 
> I just read up about hoststated, and indeed it looks very promising!
> I'm going to put a pre-order for 4.1 in, and hope they'll finish it soon :)
> 
> Now you have even more options to confuse you. :)
> 
> 
> Thanks ;)
> 
> I think I will try out pound for now, only because it looks so simple to set
> up compared to haproxy. I'm just looking for something to tie me over until
> openbsd 4.1 is out now.
> 
> Thanks
> Christian
> 
> -Dan
> >
> > --
> > "Burnished gallows set with red
> > Caress the fevered, empty mind
> > Of man who hangs bloodied and blind
> > To reach for wisdom, not for bread."  -- Deoridhe Grimsdaughter
> 

-- 
"Most moms teach their daughters how to run a house, but you?  You teach
yours the fine art of mass destruction."
      - Nabs - Goodbye is not forever

Attachment: haproxy.tgz
Description: application/tar-gz

Reply via email to