On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 01:21:31PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 12:21:43PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 04:36:49PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 11:59:12PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > > > devel/mk was also the only use of > > > > > > > > devel/libfmt > > > > devel/libbio > > > > devel/libregexp9 > > > > devel/libutf > > > Correct, those we can tackle now; I had not yet checked their relation > > > to plan9/plan9port. > > > > > > Only libbio and libregexp9 seem to be part of plan9port, i.e. > > > > > > $ pkg_info -L plan9port | egrep 'lib/lib(fmt|bio|regexp9|utf)' > > > /usr/local/plan9/lib/libbio.a > > > /usr/local/plan9/lib/libregexp9.a > > > > libfmt and libutf are part of lib9 in plan9port and libc in plan 9. > > > > > > > > Due to the dependencies between those ports we can only only delete all > > > of them as far as I can tell. > > > > > > They all build but it is doubtworthy whether anyone uses them. > > > > > > None of them have seen any updates since import in 2003 and it's the > > > story with upstream not providing any versions. > > > > > > OK to remove those? > > > > I think so, perhaps markus can confirm? > > markus? gsoares? > > Without objection, I'll remove those unversioned ports in favour of > plan9port soon.
markus mailed gsoares and myself but not the list 'they are replaced by plan9port and can be removed'.
