Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> writes:
> On 2021/02/25 14:13, Matthias Kilian wrote:
>> However, I'm not sure wether devel/cabal is the right place for
>> cabal.port.mk. Shouldn't modules-only files to be put into
>> infrastructure/mk?
>>
>> What do other ports people think?
>
> We have the same for devel/cargo, lang/go, lang/python and others.
> For gcc the main module is in lang/gcc/8 but there's a helper in
> infrastructure/mk because it (sometimes) needs to select between
> different gcc versions.
>
> I'm fairly happy having it in the main ports tree, but if it is
> placed elsewhere then the others should probably move there too.
FWIW, I chose this placement after lang/ghc/ghc.port.mk. We could
bikeshed devel/cabal{-install}/cabal{-install}.port.mk aspect of it :)
Thanks
Gretg
