On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 08:03:15PM -0500, Daniel Dickman wrote: > > > > On Feb 18, 2021, at 6:19 PM, Theo Buehler <t...@theobuehler.org> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 12:09:18AM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote: > >> The project has moved to github and is somewhat active there. > >> > >> In particular it merged a gcc-10 fix. It doesn't do releases, so I just > >> picked HEAD. fomalib.h has modified structs and function signatures, > >> so I bumped the major. > >> > >> I added a BDEP on devel/bison which might be avoidable but I haven't > >> tried. > >> > >> Lightly tested on amd64. > > > > I should just have set DISTNAME. > > I think it would be better to set the package version to 0.9.18 like in the > project’s Makefile. > > That way if the project ever does do a release we don’t have to bump EPOCH. > > Until then we can continue to resync with git head by bumping REVISION.
I can do that if you feel strongly about it. I think the date is a more useful indicator than a release from ~6 years back. What's the problem with bumping EPOCH?