On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 08:03:15PM -0500, Daniel Dickman wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Feb 18, 2021, at 6:19 PM, Theo Buehler <t...@theobuehler.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 12:09:18AM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> >> The project has moved to github and is somewhat active there.
> >> 
> >> In particular it merged a gcc-10 fix. It doesn't do releases, so I just
> >> picked HEAD. fomalib.h has modified structs and function signatures,
> >> so I bumped the major.
> >> 
> >> I added a BDEP on devel/bison which might be avoidable but I haven't
> >> tried.
> >> 
> >> Lightly tested on amd64.
> > 
> > I should just have set DISTNAME.
> 
> I think it would be better to set the package version to 0.9.18 like in the 
> project’s Makefile.
> 
> That way if the project ever does do a release we don’t have to bump EPOCH.
> 
> Until then we can continue to resync with git head by bumping REVISION.

I can do that if you feel strongly about it. I think the date is a more
useful indicator than a release from ~6 years back. What's the problem
with bumping EPOCH?

Reply via email to