On 30/01/21 22:17 -0800, Greg Steuck wrote: > jas...@openbsd.org writes: > > > Bulk build on powerpc64.ports.openbsd.org > > > > Started : Mon Jan 25 11:41:33 MST 2021 > > Finished: Sat Jan 30 12:29:09 MST 2021 > > Duration: 5 Days 0 hours 48 minutes > ... > > Build failures: 25 > > http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net/powerpc64/2021-01-25/devel/electron.log > > http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net/powerpc64/2021-01-25/www/chromium.log > > http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net/powerpc64/2021-01-25/www/iridium.log > > These end with: > ... > [182/182] LINK gn > [0x24fdbd234a00:0127/183158.750205:FATAL:args.cc(361)] Check failed: false. > OS architecture not handled. (powerpc64) > > The three ports above might go a bit further if variants of the > following patch were to be applied. Only tested to still compile on > amd64. > > Let me know how we should test this. > > From 8698fa1f94a1efd5f4ea126bbf4f6dd77d653821 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Greg Steuck <g...@nest.cx> > Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 22:04:46 -0800 > Subject: [PATCH] Support powerpc64 in gn > > --- > .../patches/patch-tools_gn_src_gn_args_cc | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 www/chromium/patches/patch-tools_gn_src_gn_args_cc > > diff --git www/chromium/patches/patch-tools_gn_src_gn_args_cc > www/chromium/patches/patch-tools_gn_src_gn_args_cc > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..4aefe14a3aa > --- /dev/null > +++ www/chromium/patches/patch-tools_gn_src_gn_args_cc > @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ > +$OpenBSD$ > + > +OpenBSD has a different architecture name not seen before in gn. > + > +Index: tools/gn/src/gn/args.cc > +--- tools/gn/src/gn/args.cc.orig > ++++ tools/gn/src/gn/args.cc > +@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ void Args::SetSystemVarsLocked(Scope* dest) const { > + arch = kMips64; > + else if (os_arch == "s390x") > + arch = kS390X; > +- else if (os_arch == "ppc64" || os_arch == "ppc64le") > ++ else if (os_arch == "ppc64" || os_arch == "ppc64le" || os_arch == > "powerpc64") > + // We handle the endianness inside //build/config/host_byteorder.gni. > + // This allows us to use the same toolchain as ppc64 BE > + // and specific flags are included using the host_byteorder logic. > -- > 2.30.0
Hi I do not see the point in having this at the moment, because I am 100% sure that it will fail just a bit later on.
