On Fri, 30 Oct 2020, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> comms/sigrok/pulseview
>
> In file included from pulseview_autogen/mocs_compilation.cpp:6:
> In file included from pulseview_autogen/4KQHGSF5UX/moc_analogsegment.cpp:10:
> In file included from
> pulseview_autogen/4KQHGSF5UX/../../../pulseview-0.4.1/pv/data/analogsegment.hpp:23:
> In file included from
> pulseview_autogen/4KQHGSF5UX/../../../pulseview-0.4.1/pv/data/segment.hpp:24:
> In file included from /pobj/pulseview-0.4.1/pulseview-0.4.1/pv/util.hpp:28:
> /usr/local/include/boost/multiprecision/cpp_dec_float.hpp:613:12: error:
> implicit instantiation of undefined template 'boost::serialization::nvp<bool>'
>
>
How about this? Does someone want to check it works with the in-tree
version of boost as well?
diff -Nur pulseview/Makefile pulseview.new/Makefile
--- pulseview/Makefile Fri Mar 8 15:00:40 2019
+++ pulseview.new/Makefile Sat Oct 31 20:58:58 2020
@@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
# $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.4 2019/03/08 20:00:40 cwen Exp $
COMMENT = command-line frontend for sigrok logic analyzer
-REVISION = 1
-
+REVISION = 2
SIGROK_PROJECT = pulseview
SIGROK_VERSION = 0.4.1
diff -Nur pulseview/patches/patch-pv_util_hpp
pulseview.new/patches/patch-pv_util_hpp
--- pulseview/patches/patch-pv_util_hpp Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 1969
+++ pulseview.new/patches/patch-pv_util_hpp Sat Oct 31 21:11:35 2020
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+$OpenBSD$
+
+backport commit 136b891 to work around boost + clang10 issue
+
+Index: pv/util.hpp
+--- pv/util.hpp.orig
++++ pv/util.hpp
+@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
+ #include <vector>
+
+ #ifndef Q_MOC_RUN
++#include <boost/serialization/nvp.hpp>
+ #include <boost/multiprecision/cpp_dec_float.hpp>
+ #endif
+
