On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 06:08:16PM +0300, Vlad Glagolev wrote: > On 12/4/06, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 02:30:12PM +0300, Vlad Glagolev wrote: > >> Small & lightweight IDE. Maybe somebody 'll want to move it to another > >> category. > >> Tested w && w/o VTE @ i386. > >> > >> ftp://slz.sytes.net/incoming/geany-0.9.tar.gz > >> > >> -- > >> Cheerz > >> Vlad / Stelz > >Looks good to me (on amd64). I'm glad they zapped the FIFO code..which > >was only causing seg. faults and lock ups. > > > >Though I see no point in keeping the vte flavor, why not enable vte by > >default? > > > >Cheers, > >Jasper > > > >-- > >``This statement is false'' > >NedBSD: http://nedbsd.eu > > > > I think cause vte isn't always needed.. and it makes geany to be more > fat or so :) > > -- > Cheerz > Vlad / Stelz
..true, that's what flavors are for :) can anyone ok this? cheers, jasper -- ``This statement is false'' NedBSD: http://nedbsd.eu
