On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 09:03:19PM -0500, Will Maier wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 05:53:31PM -0500, Aaron W. Hsu wrote:
> > I have currently tested on i386-stable and have had positive test
> > feedback from i386-current testers. I would appreciate additional
> > testing on big-endian or 64-bit machines, if possible.
>
> Tested on i386/-current. Port builds fine and looks good to me.
> Passes the regress checks; I'm not really sure how else to test it.
> ;)
I have learned that Scheme48 is 32-bit dependent, and as such, I have
added an appropriate NOT_FOR_ARCHS=${LP64_ARCHS} line, which,
according to my research, is the right way to mention this. This
change is reflected in the updated package at the same previous link I
gave.
<http://arcfide.fastmail.fm/scheme48_openbsd/scheme48.tar.gz>
If this is not the correct way to handle this situation, could someone
please correct my error?
--
Aaron Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://www.aaronhsu.com>
XMPP/Jabber/GTalk: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ: 153114301
AIM/Yahoo: NoorahAbeer | MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
