On Sunday, June 18, 2006, 07:00:07, Jakob Schlyter wrote: > ... > now some questions for this list: > - do we want each milter to run as a seperate user? I guess so.
I hope you're suggesting one _milter user and not a unique _milterX user for each individual milter. > - do we want each milter to run as a seperate group? perhaps a common > milter group would be useful, at least for protecting the sockets. I'd vote for one _milter user in one _milter group (not that my vote counts for much :-) > - do we want a common default naming for the milters socket path and/or > data storage? postfix likes sockets below /var/spool/postfix but I > guess sendmail does something else. or perhaps people prefer to talk to > their milter using a localhost-bound tcp port? Never having played with milters in sendmail I don't have any useful suggestions other than a preference for using postfix defaults when feasible. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] "The avalanche has already started, it is too Rod Dorman late for the pebbles to vote." - Ambassador Kosh
