On Fri, 19 May 2006 08:48:52 +0100, Keith Matthews wrote: >As to the inclusion of X in everything - there have been statements >that "it has been decided" - decided by whom ? - I've seen no discussion >of the matter on this list.
This is not a democracy. That is probably, outside the competence of the coders, the most important reason that OpenBSD is not an insecure pile of poo. The slavering idiots want 3d accelerated video at any cost, the latest insecure wi-fi card and no compromise in convenience for the sake of security. I do NOT want the product of their consensus. Those who do probably know where to go to get it. My puzzle is: Why the hell do they bother trying to get this project to pump out crap to sink to the level of those who already do? And your point is? >From the land "down under": Australia. Do we look <umop apisdn> from up over? Do NOT CC me - I am subscribed to the list. Replies to the sender address will fail except from the list-server.
