Ben Lovett wrote: > Yes, it's a kludge. But, until there is another way to get the full > resolution my LCD can handle on this laptop, I don't see it going > away. Driving a wide-screen display at 1024x768 when it's designed > for 1440x900 isn't ideal.
Yes, that is understandable. I've never had to use it, since I've got a 1024x768 screen, luckily. :) Note that I've tested both 855resolution (with my patch to add 945 support) and your 915resolution port, and they both seem to work. At least they display a proper list of video modes, but there's not much for me to modify, so I haven't verified that with either of them. > Honestly, though. It was easier to just make the few changes > necessary to get 915resolution working, than to modify > 855resolution to support the 945 chipsets. I'm not sure how the port people would look at two utilities having mostly the same functionality. Nikolay, is this a problem? If all's equal, I'd say 915resolution is newer/better/etc, and should just replace 855resolution. That is, unless 855resolution has some feature that 915resolution doesn't provide... :) Cheers, Dimitry
