On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 07:33:35PM +0100, Jon Olsson wrote: > On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 05:56:58PM +0100, Hannah Schroeter wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 06:28:44PM -0500, Todd C. Miller wrote: > > >The following appears to work for me. I'm not really familiar > > >with erlang--I was just hoping to get ejabberd working... > > > > Diff against the port you sent follows. > > > > And... Please commit something before the upcoming release. The erlang port > > that is in the tree just doesn't work *at all*, so anything is better > > than that. > > Sorry for the late reply. Just want to chime in here and confirm that > the erlang port millert posted + Hannahs patches works fine for me on OpenBSD > 3.8-currentish/sparc64. Building it on 3.9-beta/i386 right now. > > And I agree with Hannah, please commit this port as is, since it's > much better than the one currently in the ports tree, it's just broken > and old.
I think now is not the right time to bring in more updates, as has been asked by a few people already. We like to get a port right before committing it. 'Anything is better than...' does not make sense to me. I suggest you finetune the erlang port after tree lock and then it can get the necessary testing. steven Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
