Aleksander Piotrowski wrote: > > What about net/rtorrent? This port does merely the same in terms of getting files via BitTorrent. And I agree with your attitude that it's unnecessary to have two ports in the tree that do the same job.
But with the dnh2-version of ctorrent, clients can be managed via a control server, which is much more than rtorrent is capable. I don't wanna say that this may be better than rtorrents interactive modification capabilities, but see yourself: http://www.rahul.net/dholmes/ctorrent/ctcs.html /Markus
