On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 11:58:47 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 1 January 2006 at 19:10, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > here are some more updates, which timed-out. > > > > -------------------8<------------------- > > This diff updates the port, adds a license and PKG_ARCH. > > [...] > > > RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/p5-File-ReadBackwards/Makefile,v > > You aren't in my maillog aside from ports@ postings, and you didn't > answer my private request for the Message-ID of the notice you claim > to have sent me (you say this update request had MAINTAINER timeout > but you never mailed me). I _have_ sent(*) the mail to you!
Well, excuse me, but if I send(*) a mail which after a month I don't receive an answer. I consider that a time-out. *: With "send", I mean seeing the file being sent to my ISP's mail-server. I consider these servers to be working properly. That you didn't _receive_ that mail from those servers, was a pity, but not my fault. That's right, I don't think I was acting wrong, nor did you. > > As it is already committed "it is done" but next time do actually > notify MAINTAINER, ok? How can I verify if the mail reached it's destination, if I don't receive a bounce or whatever? If I don't receive a bounce, I think the e-mail is in some mailbox, waiting to be read to thrown away. Do I have to ask if the e-mail arrived... > > (sorry ports@ but I take having MAINTAINER seriously) > -- "Security is decided by quality" -- Theo de Raadt
pgpabrrU3XqYx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
