Hello Steve,
On Tue, 27.12.2005 at 00:18:07 -0500, Steve Shockley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's a tossup for me, although there's the argument that > courier-authlib should go under security instead of mail, since it's not > really a mail program. this sounds perfectly reasonable as well. I looked into your port of courier-authlib and find that it lists "CATEGORY=mail", though. > They're subpackages, so they really don't need their own directory. In the meantime, I've taken a short look at your real courier package and think that most of our discussion is already over because you seem to have solved most if not all of it already. So, what remains from my point of view is to get the UID problem resolved, and to get the packages into the tree. I'm not too sure why it happened already, and why I didn't see any discussion on why it has *not* been included. Also, the packages imho pose the question why Marc says he is now maintaining these, and what he does (differently)? Marc? Best, --Toni++
