hmm, on Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 03:30:26PM +0100, steven mestdagh said that > On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 03:00:44PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote: > > hi there, > > > > i have upgraded my production server to 3.8 release. > > i have no X there, but as in my previous post about the new > > rrdtools i sense some shift in what actually no_x11 means > > or will mean in the future. > > > > please note that i am describing a 3.8 release situation, > > if this is fixed in current, disregard it. > > > > first of all here's the log of installing tetex no_x11: > > > > integer> sudo pkg_add teTeX_base-3.0p1-no_x11 > > teTeX_base-3.0p1-no_x11:png-1.2.8: complete > > teTeX_base-3.0p1-no_x11:t1lib-5.0.0: complete > > teTeX_base-3.0p1-no_x11:ghostscript-fonts-6.0: complete > > Can't install ghostscript-7.05p6: lib not found ICE.8.0 > > Even by looking in the dependency tree: > > ghostscript-fonts-6.0, png-1.2.8 > > this has been fixed in -current, see cvs logs. > > > could this be fixed for 3.8 release? > > no, only security/reliability issues are fixed in -stable. > you can try to backport the fixes from current, if you really need this.
isn't this reliability? it's not the problem of the actual software but the port. and 3.8 will be supported for 12 months from now on.... -f -- many would be cowards if they had enough courage.
