On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 05:26:21PM +0100, Sebastian Rother wrote: > *snip* > >> Perl and is still buggy. So if you wanna change something then > >> please take your time...! > > > >WHAT is buggy about it ? I haven't seen any recent bug-report. > >I'm not aware of issues with it. > > Dear Marc, > > 1st: Please send a mail just to me if you've an Off-topic question
1: You're saying that a script in ports is buggy. What was the mailing-list name again ? 2: I hardly have time to answer your weird shit, but I can at least make it useful by sharing that with other people. No way will I answer to you privately ! > 2nd: The answer: > > godfather $ > perl /usr/ports/infrastructure/build/out-of-date Collecting installed > packages Collecting port versions: > complete Collecting port signatures: > complete Outdated ports: > > multimedia/streamdvd # libdvdread-0.9.4p1 -> > libdvdread-0.9.4p2 security/gpgme # gnupg-1.4.1p0 -> > gnupg-1.4.1p1 textproc/p5-XML-Parser # expat.4.0 -> expat.5.0 > godfather $ pkg_info | grep gnupg > gnupg-1.4.1p1 GNU privacy guard - a free PGP replacement > > It's the same for all entries on the list "out-of-date" provides to me. > As bernd already pointed out, you can't read. Oh, and you can't paste script output correctly either. grab a correct mailer. > You see, the Script IS buggy and not trustworthly. > In fact you can't use these informations for scripts because nobody > knows if these informations are true or false. > And that's what I would call "buggy". It's *trustworthy*. And you are about the only one here who doesn't know if this information is true or false (information is a collective in english). > So if somebody thinks about improvements he/she should take some time. > And if you've other questions about my oppinion then please send me a > mail. I suggest you take a vacation and think about what you're doing before sending email on this list again. Right now, you're just making a fool of yourself.
