Mark Millard <[email protected]> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[email protected]> writes:
> > This is preceded by an 800-line list of warnings from a single source
> > file (multi_index_block.cpp). This list is clearly truncated as it's
> > missing the final “N warnings generated” line, so my guess is there is
> > at least one error there as well which just doesn't get displayed.
> My guess: the failure occurred while the warnings were otherwise
> still being generated and that is what stopped the warnings.

That's possible.  If we assume that the error code returned by scons is
an errno, it corresponds to EBADF.  Perhaps a bug in scons causes it to
lose track of the pipe it uses to read the compiler's stderr.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [email protected]

Reply via email to