El Dissabte, 10 de març de 2012, a les 17:16:15, Ihar `Philips` Filipau va escriure: > On 3/10/12, Albert Astals Cid <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I have made a patch to popper to extract image masks as PNGs. > >> > >> Confusingly, being in slightly wrong frame of mind, I have attached it > >> to this bug - https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32340 > >> > >> What is the official process submitting patches to poppler? > > > > You attach the patch to a bug where it makes sense, i.e. not where you > > attached it. > > > > Please open a new bug and attach it there. > > Done: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47186 > > > Thanks for the patch :-) > > poppler is welcome to accept it, so that I do not need to struggle > with other barely maintained pdf2xml tools. ;) > > > BTW, does the pdftohtml has an official maintainer?
I'm the poppler maintainer by extension the pdftohtml maintainer, but to be honest i'm not very much intereste in it. > I want to try to work on my word breaking problem: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47022 > but the code in question has pretty scary TODO attached: > > // TODO: the following line assumes that text is flowing left to > // right, which will not necessarily be the case, e.g. if rotated; > // It assesses whether or not two characters are close enough to > // be part of the same string > > and I want to know whether there are objections against me simply > turning the constant used to control word break into a variable. If you can provide code that works better, and it's not much more difficult to maintain, that's always welcome. Albert > _______________________________________________ > poppler mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler _______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
