Not very clear yet, but yes, the thrust of it is to compare the visual representations, likely starting with pixel-wise difference statistics. We'll probably also include something to ensure that coalescing is getting better instead of worse.
On 8/29/11 2:09 AM, "Albert Astals Cid" <[email protected]> wrote: >A Diumenge, 28 d'agost de 2011, Josh Richardson vàreu escriure: >> I obviously can't review my own code, but I'd be happy to help review >> other people's patches to pdftohtml as they come up -- contact me >>offline >> to work out logistics if I can help. >> >> Also, Chegg is going to be building a regression suite for pdftohtml. >> >> 1. If my management agrees, would you be interested in having us >> contribute it? > >Maybe, what is it going to do? Test visually the rendered html? Do a >simple >diff between expected result and real result? _______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
