On second thought, what if I provide the old behavior via a switch? I think that the separate CSS file is the better default behavior.
Thanks, --josh On 6/22/11 11:15 AM, "Josh Richardson" <[email protected]> wrote: >Ok, will do. --josh > >On 6/22/11 12:59 AM, "Albert Astals Cid" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>A Wednesday, June 22, 2011, Josh Richardson va escriure: >>> Experienced web developers always separate their CSS from their HTML >>>file >>> This makes maintenance and overriding of the styling much easier, as >>>well >>> as keeping the HTML file itself (nearly) completely content / semantics >>> focused. >>> >>> In the complex mode, I would like to separate out the styling into a >>> separate CSS file, referenced from the output HTML file. Any >>>objections >>> to this? >> >>I'd prefer if you added this through a flag other than modifying the >>behaviour >>(since people always complain when you change the behavoiur of something) >> >>> >>> I am also cleaning up the tags so that they are all balanced and XHTML, >>> hence XML-compliant. >> >>Makes sense, but please make this a separate patch. >> >>Albert >> >>> Once this is done along with CSS separated out, I'm >>> not sure of a need for a separate xml mode for pdftohtml. Thoughts on >>> this? >>> >>> Thanks, --josh >>_______________________________________________ >>poppler mailing list >>[email protected] >>http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler > > >_______________________________________________ >poppler mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler > _______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
