Please don't talk to me only, the list is there for future reference. A Dijous 09 Octubre 2008, Dmitriy Morozov va escriure: > > Also KPDF does not use poppler, code base is very similar, but difers in > > some places. > > In KDE bugzilla I was redirected to poppler by Pino saying that that's > what Okular uses.
Right, poppler is that Okular uses, but not what KPDF uses. > > > Finally I can see the snapshots you attached are different but i don't > > see one as much worse than the other, they are just different. > > I admit that it's a matter of opinion, but clearly a number of people > on that bug exchange believe that it is so. Well, i can see no more than 2 persons speaking one and another one that voted. > I'm a little surprised > that consistency of rendering between backends is a non-priority. We try to do backends as better as possible but we are not as good as we would want, i can point you documents where the Splash renderer is better than Cairo and ones where the Cairo renderer is better than Splash, help is always appreciated, creating a PDF renderer is not easy. > > > So please do what everybody else does, file a bug, and please don't do > > what everybody does and stop thinking your bug is the first and only one > > that should be fixed as soon as possible. > > You don't need to lecture me, Albert. An answer alone would have > sufficed. At no point did I imply that this bug needs to be fixed as > soon as possible. I was merely trying to find out if this is a known > problem in the poppler community. It's a known problem? Yeah somewhat, but if you file a bug it will be written :-) Has it priority in MY todo list? None I can't tell anything about other poppler devels of course. And as i already said more helping hands are always welcome. Albert > > Best, > Dmitriy _______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
