On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 04:26:48PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > Alle sabato 19 gennaio 2008, Albert Astals Cid ha scritto: > > So the 0.8 release date is "aproaching" (we decided it to be 3rd March > > 2008) that means less than two months to go. > > Personally I'd go with two months from now, as major works was introduced in > the core (and still some will hopefully go, I hope), and frontends have to be > adjusted/improved accordingly. > > > So here is the release plan, feel free to comment: > > Always personally, I don't see the reason to use 0.7 just for beta/rc naming, > instead of picking eg 0.7.80, 81, ... 90, and so on. After all, we are not > the Linux kernel, nor a GNOME application.
I don't understand your suggestion. Why would using 0.7.80 be better than 0.7.0? Or did you mean 0.6.80? One probably with using something like: 0.6.80 is that you'd have to guess how many prereleases you were going to have before going final. -Jeff _______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
