Le dimanche 26 août 2007 à 12:25 +0200, Pino Toscano a écrit : > Alle sabato 25 agosto 2007, Albert Astals Cid ha scritto: > > I vote from 3rd september. > > +1 > > > I know Carlos wanted to introduce changes to glib and Pino to qt. Send them > > NOW! > > Here you have it. (Let's see what I can do for the annotations stuff.) > > > *** "unwrapping" of ff,fi, etc ligatures *** > > I don't want to do it, but that's only me, there seems to be lots of votes > > on the other direction, what do you, Carlos, Jeff, Pino, krh say? And any > > of the yes voters will send a patch? ;-) > > I think the responsibility for "unwrapping" the ligatures should be on the > clients (== users of poppler == applications, mostly), because they can > really know whether they can handle ligatures or not. If they can, good for > them - if not, they will need to "unwrap" them at once.
To be clear: do you mean Evince as client for instance? > > *** beign more lax about ending %%EOF *** > > Lately there seem to be some pdf around that do not end with %%EOF. That > > sucks as they break the check i introduced for %%EOF beign present and are > > not REAL pdf. > > [...] > > So i introduced the %%EOF check to avoid that. > > But it seems that is hurting us now, so we can remove the %%EOF check and > > try to improve poppler not to crash on incomplete documents or leave it > > that way and keep repeating our users that if it does not have an %%EOF > > it's not a PDF and that they should bug the producer not the consumer of > > the pdf file. Or any other suggestion? > > +1 on removing the check, as other than exisiting documents without it, there > are documents with a bogus EOF marker (like "%EO" or sort of, see [1]). > > [1] http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142140 Laurent.
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
