> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:platform-driver-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Darren Hart
> Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 6:21 AM
> To: Chakravarty, Souvik K <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; Kasagar, Srinidhi
> <[email protected]>; Zha, Qipeng <[email protected]>;
> Muralidhar, Rajeev D <[email protected]>; Ghorai, Sukumar
> <[email protected]>; Yu, Ong Hock <[email protected]>; Li,
> Aubrey <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] platform:x86: Add Intel Telemetry Core Driver
> 
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 04:12:30PM +0530, Souvik Kumar Chakravarty wrote:
> > Intel PM Telemetry is a software mechanism via which various SoC PM
> > and performance related parameters like PM counters, firmware trace
> > verbosity, the status of different devices inside the SoC, etc can be
> > monitored and analyzed. The different samples that may be monitored
> > can be configured at runtime via exported APIs.
> >
> > This patch adds the telemetry core driver that implements basic
> > exported APIs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Souvik Kumar Chakravarty
> > <[email protected]>
> 
> Qipeng, would you please review this series and confirm that you and Souvik
> have aligned on this implementation?

Yes I have already aligned with Qipeng internally for this telemetry PMC 
resource addition.
> 
> 
> >
> > ---
> > Changes in v3:
> > * Clean code using checkpatch.pl from Kernel v4.3-rc4
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > * Fix issues in code style, indentation & comments
> > * Follow kernel-doc sytle comments
> > * Changed Banner to include "All Rights Reserved"
> > * Change telemetry_plt_config.telem_in_use type to bool
> > * Introduce Default empty platform specific callbacks to remove NULL
> > checks
> > * Use pr_fmt in init
> > * Change to MODULE_LICENSE to GPL
> > ---
> 
> ...
> 
> > +static inline int telemetry_get_pssevtname(enum telemetry_unit
> telem_unit,
> > +                                      const char **name, int len)
> > +{
> > +   struct telemetry_unit_config psscfg;
> > +   int i = 0;
> 
> It's a minor nit, but i doesn't need to be initialized here or in the function
> below as its initial value is set in the for loop.
> 
> 
> --
> Darren Hart
> Intel Open Source Technology Center
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86"
> in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo
> info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" 
in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to