gvarsanyi added a comment.
In D22468#496052 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D22468#496052>, @ngraham wrote: > I'm not sold on the proposal to use 1.25x increments, personally. For my personal use case, I like using 1.1x (13" 1080p screen) and I wouldn't want to lose that. Screen size and DPI combinations are so variable that I think it makes sense to support a higher level of precision. Apple can get away with their very low configurability because of tight control over the hardware that allows them to avoid selling machines where a given option wouldn't work. > > That said, I could get behind 0.25x increments if there's some "advanced" page or mods in the GUI that exposes 0.1 incrememebts, or even a spinbox or text box or something. > > Either is better than 0.2 increments though. As pointed out, that missed the all-important 1.5x. I think we'd all like to support everyone's use cases. My argument is that 0.25/0.75 steps are almost as important as 0.5. If devs/users are not concerned about too much granularity (e.g. artifacts, testing), this can be fixed easily by doing 0.05 increments - it's just a slider anyway. I also like the idea of adding a simple stepper with few predefined values, and an "advanced" configuration option for very precise settings. This makes me think: current KCM partially breaks if I set fractional scaling on Wayland to a non-integer value (the scale is not represented on the preview pane, and there is no selection in the scale dropdown). Probably a slider can better represent a value like 1.375x, even if it doesn't allow for picking it. REPOSITORY R104 KScreen REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D22468 To: romangg, #plasma, #kwin Cc: gvarsanyi, davidedmundson, ngraham, mvourlakos, knambiar, broulik, filipf, plasma-devel, LeGast00n, jraleigh, fbampaloukas, GB_2, ragreen, Pitel, ZrenBot, himcesjf, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, mart
