broulik added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS
> backtraceratingwidget.h:50 > > - bool m_star1; > - bool m_star2; > - bool m_star3; > - > + BacktraceParser::Usefulness m_usefullness; > QPixmap m_errorPixmap; `usefulness` with one L > debugger.cpp:91 > { > - if (!isValid() || !m_config->hasGroup(m_backend)) { > - return QString(); > - } else { > - return m_config->group(m_backend).readPathEntry("Exec", QString()); > - } > + return (isValid() && m_config->hasGroup(m_backend)) > + ? m_config->group(m_backend).readPathEntry("Exec", QString()) I find early returns to be more readable. Maybe just remove the explicit `} else {` statement > drkonqi.cpp:84 > { > - static DrKonqi *drKonqiInstance = nullptr; > - if (!drKonqiInstance) { > - drKonqiInstance = new DrKonqi(); > - } > - return drKonqiInstance; > + static DrKonqi drKonqiInstance; > + return &drKonqiInstance; +1 REPOSITORY R871 DrKonqi REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D22233 To: tcanabrava Cc: broulik, sitter, plasma-devel, LeGast00n, jraleigh, fbampaloukas, GB_2, ragreen, Pitel, ZrenBot, himcesjf, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, mart