ndavis added a comment.
In D19230#422088 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D19230#422088>, @ngraham wrote: > We could, but is that really necessary? In general we try to avoid having UI elements dynamically show and hide themselves outside of the narrowly-defined exception of when a UI element is inapplicable to the currently active hardware. That condition doesn't apply here, so what we would do instead is enable and disable the button, which I think would be a bit weird. Fair point. I just think it's not necessary to show the button if you're not using the setting that uses the settings behind the button. REPOSITORY R120 Plasma Workspace BRANCH replace-tristate-checkbox-with-combobox (branched from master) REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D19230 To: ngraham, #plasma, Zren, #vdg, davidedmundson, ndavis Cc: totte, ndavis, abetts, plasma-devel, jraleigh, GB_2, ragreen, Pitel, ZrenBot, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, sebas, apol, mart
