raddison added a comment.

  In D16031#368865 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D16031#368865>, @ngraham wrote:
  
  > In D16031#368861 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D16031#368861>, @raddison 
wrote:
  >
  > > @ngraham Is it going to look something like that? 
https://phabricator.kde.org/file/data/zaerjwktbynwubnvu3ja/PHID-FILE-y52h6nwujyugxuqkc73z/maxresdefault.jpg
  >
  >
  > No, screenshots for the current proposal are in the Test Plan section of 
this patch. The image you're referring to was the old Plasma 5 design that was 
replaced in Plasma 5.8. I would support going back to that style of design 
because it solves virtually all of the problems here. But so far there doesn't 
seem to be a lot of enthusiasm for that. The
  
  
  Truth to tell neither am I enthused about the old Plasma 5 design. 
  I've also looked at the test plan and it's not exactly a stroke of genius if 
it looks like 
https://phabricator.kde.org/file/data/w3iyc7eov3ys6kmhrwi7/PHID-FILE-nya3nyqpjbmnijijvlwm/Screenshot_20181129_233236.png

REPOSITORY
  R120 Plasma Workspace

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D16031

To: ngraham, #vdg, #plasma, rizzitello, davidedmundson
Cc: raddison, romangg, davidedmundson, rizzitello, abetts, pstefan, broulik, 
rikmills, filipf, rooty, plasma-devel, ragreen, Pitel, ZrenBot, lesliezhai, 
ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, sebas, apol, mart

Reply via email to