Would it make sense to maybe write it down now? I wasn't aware of it and it's a good rule. It would be useful both for documentation and to get inspired when new policies are required.
Aleix On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:49 PM, David Edmundson < nore...@phabricator.kde.org> wrote: > davidedmundson created this revision. > Restricted Application added a project: Plasma. > Restricted Application added a subscriber: plasma-devel. View Revision > <https://phabricator.kde.org/D9040> > *REVISION SUMMARY* > > Up till this commit we had an unwritten policy: > > If it's a shared password (wifi, printer, samba) we can reveal the password > If it's a personal password, you cannot > > This commit didn't unify the workspace behaviour, but broke it from what > we have > elsewhere user manager and polkit. > > It didn't fix anything, but introduced multiple issues. > > BUG: 387418 > and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487169 > > Even if we followed a kiosk restriction, I can't use that from SDDM. > > This reverts commit 2f9bfbc5e153cf98c33c6eebbf2859a48493f4b9. > > *REPOSITORY* > R120 Plasma Workspace > > *BRANCH* > master > > *REVISION DETAIL* > https://phabricator.kde.org/D9040 > > *AFFECTED FILES* > lookandfeel/contents/lockscreen/MainBlock.qml > sddm-theme/Login.qml > > *To: *davidedmundson > *Cc: *plasma-devel, ZrenBot, progwolff, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, > jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, mart >
