On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 13:49:16 +0200
Harald Sitter <sit...@kde.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Jonathan Riddell <j...@jriddell.org>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 01:01:46PM +0200, Harald Sitter wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Jonathan Riddell
> >> <j...@jriddell.org> wrote:
> >> > qqc2-desktop-style will not be included
> >>
> >> :O but kirigami/qqc is fairly defunct without this
> >
> > The hope is to include is in frameworks. Since kirigami is also in
> > frameworks that's the sensible place to put it. Maybe Marco can
> > give us the status of that.
>
> Sure, but... 5.38 is tagged already, so it could only become a
> framework for 5.39.. and that is a problem.
>
> KF 5.39 is scheduled for release on Oct 14.
> Plasma 5.11 is schedule for release on Oct 10, which would have no
> QQC2 style for 4 days.
> Plasma 5.11's only beta is next week, which would have no QQC2 style
> at all.
>
> As I've said kirigami very much needs the style to properly integrate
> into the workspace, so releasing entirely without the style seems
> super ill-advised given discover and systemsettings would have
> "severe" style issues. At least for the beta there needs to be a
> release in some form or fashion outside frameworks. For the Plasma
> final release we maybe can wiggle through with the beta release as a
> stop-gap for that 4 day time window until frameworks releases? Or
> maybe dfaure could be swayed to move the frameworks release forward?
Would this warrant moving the Plasma release forward a few days, so we
Frameworks 5.39 is out and Kirigami QQC2 is released?
--
sebas
http://vizZzion.org ⦿ http://www.kde.org
