On 08/30/2017 03:50 PM, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > 2017-08-29 18:39 GMT+02:00 Martin Flöser <mgraess...@kde.org>: > >> One of the things currently being worked on for the phone is to get rid of >> XWayland. This could give you a nice performance boost as you have a Wayland >> only system (of course it's also nice to have X support, but one cannot get >> it with GL support, so the gain is not worth it IMHO). > I am relatively sure that Zlatan (or CTO) would make pure Wayland a > pretty high priority ;-) Personally, I would not even bother with X on > the phone and just require everything running there to use Wayland. I > briefly thought that having X is useful for the convergence usecase > (if that becomes a reality), but even for that the apps need some > level of adjustment for a phone already, and in that case walking the > extra mile to get things to work with Wayland makes sense. > > Cheers, > Matthias Yes, having pure Wayland would be perfect case for phone device for many reasons and X is not important at all (not at this stage nor do I think in future plans - though if community decides and does X support, no one will stop such effort and maybe we even help but we are aiming at Wayland fully).
Happy hacking, Z
