graesslin added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS
> tcberner wrote in abstractlocker.cpp:62 > I'm not sure, if we can predictably get the name of the correct "broken" > session from within the script -- of course, the script could just unlock all > the sessions by iterating over them, but that seems rude. Maybe the error > message `text` could be modified to contain correct session name: > > "# ck-unlock-session [the current session name]\n\n" That sounds reasonable and is what has been done for loginctl lately. > tcberner wrote in abstractlocker.cpp:67-70 > I think seeing this message annoys the users. So pointing them to possible > solutions for future failures is a good thing, even when it might be a bit > technical. I doubt that. If the users see this message and don't have either consolekit or loginctl support either their distro messed things up or they compiled themselves and know what they are doing and have seen the cmake warnings. In both cases it doesn't really help to have this information then. REPOSITORY R133 KScreenLocker REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D6004 To: tcberner, #freebsd, graesslin, #plasma Cc: erichameleers, plasma-devel, ZrenBot, spstarr, progwolff, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, mart, lukas
