Am 2017-06-10 17:59, schrieb Roman Gilg:
Can I just push them again until - but excluding - 28e4e9eaad1? This
would be:
You don't need to repush the scripty commits as scripty will fix up
anyway. Also the multiple merges of Plasma/5.10 can be condensed to one
new merge. Should be four commits to push if I counted correctly.
Cheers
Martin
4cbd213 SVN_SILENT made messages (.desktop file) - always resolve ours
74f1cee SVN_SILENT made messages (.desktop file) - always resolve ours
3fd6307 [platforms/drm] Make Atomic Mode Setting the new default
5ba13cc SVN_SILENT made messages (.desktop file) - always resolve ours
21bd910 [DRM plugin] Remove dead code
cf7ef1b Set pid on the ClientConnection backing the PlasmaWindow
surface.
baf1144 Merge branch 'Plasma/5.10'
bddde8d Fix compilation without libinput. #if is used everywhere else,
#ifdef is wrong.
2281bd1 SVN_SILENT made messages (.desktop file) - always resolve ours
1432efb SVN_SILENT made messages (.desktop file) - always resolve ours
e591280 Merge branch 'Plasma/5.10'
Greetings
Roman
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Martin Flöser <mgraess...@kde.org>
wrote:
Am 2017-06-10 11:43, schrieb Roman:
Why have there been so many commits removed? I thought the
offending
one was 28e4e9eaad1, so everything before that couldn't have
stayed
in?
I asked for the first one prior to montel's first commit according
to git log on cgit.kde.org [1]. Might be that I did a mistake there
- only have a tablet currently. Also it did not look like many
commits to me.
Cheers
Martin
Greetings
Roman
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Rik Mills <rikmi...@kubuntu.org>
wrote:
Fair enough. I will not poke at that further then.
On 09/06/17 21:20, Ben Cooksley wrote:
From my understanding invasive changes were committed without
review,
which were similar to changes which had been previously been
rejected
in review.
Regards,
Ben
I look forward to good progress being restored. :)
Links:
------
[1] http://cgit.kde.org
